An MVR Takes as Long as the State Takes. Your Deadline Is 30 Days

An MVR takes as long as the issuing jurisdiction takes, and no federal deadline governs it. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations set the deadline on you: 49 CFR 391.23(a)(1) requires an inquiry “within 30 days of the date the driver’s employment begins, to each State where the driver held or holds a motor vehicle operator’s license or permit during the preceding 3 years,” and 391.23(b) requires the record to be “placed in the driver qualification file within 30 days of the date the driver’s employment begins.”

Two duties, one number, both yours. The state’s turnaround is a third thing, on no federal clock.

How long does the carrier have to get an MVR?

Thirty days from the date employment begins — for both the asking and the filing.

Read the third row twice: it is the one that catches people who have internalized “30 days.”

How long does a State actually take?

As long as its own release process takes. 391.23(b) defers to the jurisdiction: the inquiry “must be made in the form and manner each authority prescribes.” Part 384 says the same thing from the State’s side. Under 49 CFR 384.225(e)(4), a motor carrier or prospective motor carrier gets the driver’s CDLIS record only “after notification to a driver,” and then “from the State according to its procedures.”

The one federal timing duty on a State here is not a turnaround promise: 384.225(c) has the State make CDLIS record information available within 10 days of a conviction or disqualification. That governs how current the record is, not how fast your request is answered.

So do not plan around a published turnaround figure; ask the authority or your agent, and record the date you asked. For the outer range: in the 2022 rulemaking that rewrote 391.23(b), a screening vendor told FMCSA that obtaining MVRs from foreign driver’s licensing authorities “often can take 90 to 120 days” (87 FR 13192).

What if the MVR has not come back by day 30?

You document the effort. That is the only remedy the rule provides.

What you do: keep dated proof of each request — authority queried, date, channel, and any response — in the driver qualification file, in place of the record you could not get. 391.23(b): “If no motor vehicle record is received from a driver’s licensing authority required to submit this response, the motor carrier must document a good faith effort to obtain such information.”

Status: required. FMCSA said in the 2022 final rule that “documentation of a good faith effort to obtain the MVR is sufficient evidence of compliance with the regulatory requirement,” because “it is impossible for a motor carrier to know what records are or are not maintained for a particular driver by the licensing authority.”

The gotcha: the allowance is a hiring provision only. FMCSA clarified in the same document that “the requirement to make a ‘good faith effort’ to obtain an MVR applies to investigations made when hiring a driver under Sec. 391.23(b), not to the annual MVR review.” The annual inquiry has no such escape hatch.

What does an auditor score if the record is missing?

The qualification file, not the inquiry. 391.51(b)(2) requires the file to hold “a copy of the motor vehicle record received from each driver’s licensing authority pursuant to § 391.23(a)(1),” and the list of acute and critical regulations in appendix B to part 385 names § 391.51(b)(2) — “Failing to maintain inquiries into driver’s driving record in driver’s qualification file” — as a critical regulation. On a compliance review, appendix B assesses one point for each pattern of noncompliance with a critical regulation; a pattern is more than one violation, and where documents are sampled it takes at least 10 percent of those examined. Part 391 sits in the Driver factor.

The record belongs in the driver qualification file itself. Safety performance history replies do not — 391.23(c)(1) puts those in the separate driver investigation history file kept under 391.53.

What a fast MVR still will not tell you

A driving record carries what the State posts to it. For CDL holders, 49 CFR 384.225(a)(1) has the State post “all convictions, disqualifications and other licensing actions” for traffic-control violations. Nothing in that list says whether the driver finished the contract, returned the truck, or walked off in week three, and the other required checks do not close the gap: 391.23(d) and (e) reach accident data and drug-and-alcohol history, not job performance. Which is why 391.23(c)(2) still contemplates “personal interviews, telephone interviews, letters, or any other method.”

That is the layer cdlscan is built for: reviews written by carriers that actually employed the driver. It sits alongside the required checks and replaces none of them — the 391.23 inquiries, the 391.25 annual review, the qualification file under 391.51 and the Clearinghouse queries all remain yours. Before relying on third-party information about a driver in an employment decision, confirm with your own counsel which obligations attach under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Frequently asked questions